Saving water in everyday life

This survey assesses water-saving habits at home and outside the home: how people use water, which practices they already follow, what prevents them from saving more, how accessible water-saving solutions are, and which measures could increase engagement.

The Saving water in everyday life survey measures how households actually use water and what would help them use less. It covers how important saving feels, how often people act on it, which specific habits they keep, how accessible saving solutions are, the barriers in the way, and which measures they rank as most effective. Use it to shape guidance, device programmes and incentives that fit daily routines.

What the “Saving water in everyday life” survey measures

The questionnaire rates how important water saving is and how often people try to save at home, then lists concrete habits — turning off the tap while brushing or soaping, choosing a shower over a bath, shortening showers, running full loads, using eco modes, fixing leaks fast, reusing water, using a basin instead of running water, tracking meters. It gauges how accessible fixtures like aerators, low-flow showerheads and dual-flush toilets are, how convenient monitoring feels, and the barriers (no habit, no visible bill savings, cost, install/approval hurdles for renters, lack of information, inconvenience, poor plumbing, no household support). A next-month readiness matrix captures intended actions, and a ranking question orders which measures — clear guidance, affordable devices, building support, financial incentives, convenient monitoring, leak alerts, educational reminders — people find most effective.

Who the “Saving water in everyday life” template is for

It suits water utilities and municipal water programmes, housing associations and building managers, sustainability and ESG teams, environmental NGOs, and property developers or facility managers optimising consumption. It is useful before a device-subsidy scheme, a metering rollout or an awareness campaign, and when a savings programme needs evidence of what residents will actually adopt.

How to adapt the template to your needs

Match the habit and device lists to your housing stock — drop garden watering for apartments, add outdoor use for houses. Reword “at home” to “at work” for a workplace programme. Branch so renters who face install barriers get device-subsidy and landlord-approval questions while owners get direct upgrade prompts. The ranking question can be trimmed to the measures you can actually fund, and the readiness matrix turned into a commitment tracker for a follow-up wave.

Questions and answer options

Question type: single choice.
Answer options:
— Very important
— Rather important
— Rather not important
— Not important at all
— Hard to say
Question type: single choice.
Answer options:
— Always or almost always
— Often
— Sometimes
— Rarely
— Never
— Hard to say
Question type: multiple choice.
Answer options:
— Turn off the tap while brushing teeth/soaping hands
— Choose a shower instead of a bath
— Shorten shower time
— Run the washing machine/dishwasher only with a full load
— Use eco mode on appliances (if available)
— Fix leaks quickly (tap, toilet tank, pipes)
— Collect water for reuse (e.g., for watering plants)
— Use a basin/container instead of running water for some tasks
— Track water use via meters/bills
Question type: single choice.
Answer options:
— Already installed and used
— I know how to install them, and it’s accessible
— Rather accessible, but I haven’t done it yet
— Rather not accessible (difficult/expensive/no possibility)
— I don’t know what these are / I’m not familiar
Question type: multiple choice.
Answer options:
— No habit / I forget
— I don’t see noticeable savings on bills
— Water-saving solutions seem expensive
— Hard to install / requires approval (rent, building management)
— Not enough information on what actually works
— It’s inconvenient to change habits (e.g., shorten showers)
— Leaks/plumbing are in poor condition and hard to fix quickly
— No support for this practice in the household/building
Question type: single-answer matrix.
Answer options:
— Turn off the tap while soaping/brushing teeth
— Reduce shower time by at least 2–3 minutes
— Run the washing machine/dishwasher only with a full load
— Check and fix possible leaks (tap/toilet tank)
— Install or replace water-saving attachments/settings (if possible)
Question type: ranking.
Answer options:
— Clear recommendations and instructions (what to do and the impact)
— Affordable water-saving devices (aerators, showerheads, toilet tanks)
— Support from building/management company (checks, leak repairs)
— Financial incentives (discounts, subsidies, support programs)
— Convenient usage monitoring (readings, notifications, analytics)
— Leak alerts and fast repair services
— Educational materials and reminders (habits and examples)

Similar survey templates

Frequently asked questions

Water saving splits into two levers: free behaviour change (shorter showers, full loads) and one-off fixture upgrades. Someone can be highly motivated yet blocked from installing a low-flow showerhead as a renter. Measuring them apart tells you whether to push habits or subsidise hardware.
The barrier “hard to install / requires approval” and the accessibility question flag them. For that group the effective measures shift toward landlord/building support and portable habits, so branch them away from questions that assume they can modify plumbing.
It signals a feedback problem, not a motivation one. If people don’t notice bill impact, saving feels pointless — the fix is convenient monitoring, readings and clear before/after figures, which the “effective measures” ranking lets you confirm as a priority.
Treat it as a budget-allocation guide. Because respondents order the measures rather than just picking them, you can see whether affordable devices outrank financial incentives or educational reminders, and direct spending to what people themselves say moves the needle.