Trust in public services and institutions

This survey assesses the level of public trust in services and institutions that perform socially significant functions. It helps understand which factors shape trust and how citizens perceive transparency, accessibility, and the quality of public services.

The Trust in public services and institutions template gauges how much citizens rely on organizations that carry out socially significant functions. It clarifies what shapes trust and how people perceive the transparency, accessibility and quality of public services. Use it to track public sentiment and pinpoint where confidence is gained or lost.

What the “Trust in public services and institutions” survey measures

The survey opens by defining what counts as a public service, then measures the overall level of trust and how often respondents actually use or interact with these services. It identifies the factors that drive trust — transparency, effectiveness, staff professionalism, personal experience, reputation and availability of information — rates how clear and convenient the services feel for citizens, reveals which channels (official websites, information centers, public events, online services or in-person contact) inspire the most trust, and assesses how far institutions are seen to consider citizens' interests, ending with an open question about what would raise trust.

Who the “Trust in public services and institutions” template is for

It suits public administrations, municipalities, non-profits and utilities, as well as researchers and communication teams studying civic attitudes. It is valuable ahead of a service reform, after launching a new online portal, or as a recurring barometer of public confidence. Agencies wanting to compare in-person and digital channels, or to benchmark perception against actual usage, will get particular value.

How to adapt the template to your needs

Replace the generic definition with the specific institution or service you are studying — a health service, a tax office or a local council. Localize the trust factors and interaction channels (add a mobile app or a call center if relevant), and remove options that do not apply. You can branch the frequency question so that non-users receive different follow-ups than regular users, and turn the open final question into structured suggestions if you need actionable comparisons.

Questions and answer options

Question type: single choice.
Answer options:
— Fully trust
— Mostly trust
— Neutral
— Mostly do not trust
— Do not trust at all
Question type: single choice.
Answer options:
— Regularly
— From time to time
— Rarely
— Never
Question type: multiple choice.
Answer options:
— Transparency of work
— Effectiveness of services
— Professionalism of staff
— Personal experience
— Reputation
— Availability of information
Question type: multiple choice.
Answer options:
— Official websites
— Information centers
— Public events
— Online services
— In-person communication with specialists

Similar survey templates

Frequently asked questions

The opening definition block aligns every respondent on what counts as a public service or institution, so answers about trust and usage are comparable rather than shaped by different personal interpretations.
The factors question lists personal experience and reputation as separate options, and cross-referencing them with the usage-frequency question shows whether trust among frequent users differs from trust based on second-hand impressions.
Yes. The interaction question separates official websites and online services from information centers, public events and in-person contact with specialists, so you can see which channels build the most confidence.
A dedicated rating asks to what extent institutions consider citizens' interests, and comparing it with the clarity-and-convenience rating reveals whether perceived responsiveness matches everyday usability.