Learning
Mentorship and Coaching Effectiveness Survey

Mentorship and Coaching Effectiveness Survey

This survey evaluates the quality of mentorship and coaching programs, their impact on employees’ professional development, and satisfaction with the process. It identifies strengths and issues, offering ways to improve. Suitable for HR managers and companies aiming to develop talent through mentorship.

Use template

The Mentorship and Coaching Effectiveness Survey helps you find out whether your mentorship and coaching programs are actually helping employees grow. It gathers direct feedback on how mentees experience the process, what's working, and what's getting in the way. Use it to build a program that people genuinely value, not just one that exists on paper.

What the “Mentorship and Coaching Effectiveness Survey” survey measures

This survey measures overall satisfaction with mentorship and coaching programs, frequency of mentor-mentee interaction, and perceived impact on professional skills, confidence, career growth, and motivation. It also captures how accessible mentors are within the company, which parts of the program employees value most, and open-ended feedback on obstacles and improvement ideas. Together, these responses give you a clear picture of program strengths, gaps, and practical next steps.

Who the “Mentorship and Coaching Effectiveness Survey” template is for

This template is built for HR managers, L&D teams, and people leaders responsible for running or overseeing mentorship and coaching initiatives. It works well for companies of any size looking to formalize talent development, check in on an existing program, or gather evidence before expanding or redesigning one. It's also useful after a mentorship cohort or coaching cycle wraps up, to capture feedback while it's still fresh.

How to adapt the template to your needs

You can tailor the wording to match your program's structure — for example, replacing 'mentor or coach' with a specific program name or distinguishing between peer mentoring and formal coaching if you run both. Add branching logic so employees who select 'Never' for interaction frequency skip questions about mentor accessibility and instead go straight to questions about barriers. You can also add demographic or department filters to spot patterns across teams, or include a question asking mentees to identify their mentor if you want to track individual performance alongside program-wide results.

Questions and answer options

Question type: single choice.
Answer options:
— Weekly
— Biweekly
— Monthly
— Less than once a month
— Never
Question type: multiple rating.
Answer options:
— Professional skills
— Confidence in work
— Career growth
— Motivation
Question type: multiple choice.
Answer options:
— Feedback on work
— Development of specific skills
— Career growth advice
— Motivation and support

Similar survey templates

Frequently asked questions

Look at the multiple rating question on professional skills, confidence, career growth, and motivation alongside the open-text improvement suggestions — together they show whether the program is translating into real development outcomes.
If most respondents report interacting with their mentor less than once a month or never, it often points to scheduling conflicts, unclear program expectations, or lack of accountability structures worth investigating further.
Yes, running a parallel version of this survey for mentors gives you a fuller picture, since mentors can flag issues like time constraints or unclear program guidelines that mentees may not see.
Many companies run it at the end of each mentorship cycle or twice a year for ongoing programs, so they can track whether changes made based on past feedback are actually improving the experience.